Les ânes, les codes et l'ordinateur: des hommes et des femmes utiliseraient-ils la jeunesse dans le ministère de la Défense par eXemple?...

C'est un dessin humouristique de Nozzman dans le Technisch Weekblad (No 40) qui inspire cette idée.

Pensez-vous que le top gouverne correctement? Que sa politique soit correcte? Qu'ils comprennent un peu les choses de l'Internet et certains mots comme protection et security dans le bon sens? Qu'en pensent les ministres auX affaires internationales? Que pensent-ils du Duty of Care et Responsibility to Protect, Code of Conduct, légitimité, RESPECT, etcetera.

Public liability is part of the law of tort which focuses on civil wrongs. An applicant (the injured party) usually sues the respondent (the owner or occupier) under common law based on negligence and/or damages. Claims are usually successful when it can be shown that the owner/occupier was responsible for an injury, therefore they breached their duty of care.

The duty of care is very complex, but in basic terms it is the standard by which one would expect to be treated whilst one is in the care of another.

Once a breach of duty of care has been established, an action brought in a common law court would most likely be successful. Based on the injuries and the losses of the applicant the court would award a financial compensation package.

in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_liability

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_of_care

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligence:

[...]

Through civil litigation, if an injured person proves that another person acted negligently to cause their injury, they can recover damages to compensate for their harm. Proving a case for negligence can potentially entitle the injured plaintiff to compensation for harm to their body, property, mental well-being, financial status, or intimate relationships. However, because negligence cases are very fact-specific, this general definition does not fully explain the concept of when the law will require one person to compensate another for losses caused by accidental injury. Further, the law of negligence at common law is only one aspect of the law of liability. Although resulting damages must be proven in order to recover compensation in a negligence action, the nature and extent of those damages are not the primary focus of negligence cases.

[...]

Ces quelques liens s'adressent en fait auX responsables qui représentent les populations: les pouvoirs publics. Car il y a des droits mais aussi des devoirs, et des obligations quand on est vraiment responsable. Au cas où on aurait encouragé l'irresponsabilité organisée, par négligence ou mégarde ou manquement grave, il faudrait organiser une rencontre, en zone internationale, à La Haye. Avec la Justice internationale pas trop loin. Toujours au chapitre principe de précaution et de prévention. Sur le principe de responsabilité quand on gouverne.

P.s: Quand on pense ministères, on pense à l'Europe et auX différentes Directions concernées également.