On
returning from England, Erasmus wrote his second most popular work, the
Enchiridion Militis Christiani (Handbook for the Militant Christian), modelled
in part on the Enchiridion of Faith, Hope, and Charity of St. Augustine. This
book is his direct intervention into the new “middle class” that was developing
in the cities, and was one of the first secular works designed to teach the
basics of Christian morality. The initiative for the book came from a friend, a
woman, whose weapons-merchant husband had become a profligate womanizer. She
asked Erasmus to write something to put her husband back on the straight path.
The word “Enchiridion” has a double meaning, meaning both a “manual” but also a
short sword, or dagger, symbolizing the book should be used as a weapon to
fight off evil.
[...]
In the
Enchiridion, Erasmus fully expresses his faith in the goodness of his fellow
man and, as always, the necessity to teach: “In regard to the soul we are
capable of divinity, that is, we may climb in flight above the minds of the
very angels themselves and become one with God.” Later, he
criticizes the Church:
Charity
does not consist in many visits to churches, in many prostrations before the
statues of saints, in the lighting of candles, or in the repetition of a number
of designated prayers. Of all these things, God has no need. Paul declares
charity to be the edification of one’s neighbor, the attempt to integrate all
men into one body so that all men may become one in Christ, the loving of one’s
neighbor as one’s self. Charity for Paul has many facets; he is charitable who
rebukes the erring, who teaches the ignorant, who lifts up the fallen, who
consoles the downhearted, who supports the needy. If a man is truly charitable,
he will devote, if needs be, all his wealth, all his zeal, all his care to the
benefit of others. Keep all this in mind, my brother in Christ, and accept this
advice; Have only contempt for the changeable crowd with its ways. To be holy,
ignore demands of your senses. ... Do not fear the crowd to the extent that you
dare not defend the truth.
You say
that you love your wife simply because she is your spouse. There is no merit in
this. Even the pagans do this, and the love can be based on physical pleasure
alone. But, on the other hand, if you love her you see the image of Christ,
because you perceive in her His reverence, modesty and purity, then you do not
love her in herself but in Christ. You love Christ in her. This is what we mean
by spiritual love.
On peut être inspirée.... J'ai retrouvé cela
dans mon blog, billet posté le 19 septembre dernier... Est-ce que le blog de
l'âne of Ezelblog pourra aider Érasme et l'Europe des valeurs retrouvées. Nous
faisons de la politique européeenne. J'attends des commentaires;)...
P.S. Éric, est-ce que je vous ai déjà serrer la main
quelque part ?...
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten