vrijdag 28 oktober 2016

L'autorégulation dans le commerce avec des sites porteurs de violence et de pornographie dans les chambres à coucher et les foyers...

...

Madame Clinton ou monsieur Trump peuvent demander à leurs équipes de commenter chez GOOGLE.

...

Les frérots Guillemot et les autres aussi d'ailleurs.

...

Les (eX-)Commissaires européens et leurs équipes, même le prince Constantin - qu'a fait la famille royale hollandaise à BruXelles? - aussi:

Content which might seriously impair minors

- This kind of content must not be included in any programme signifying total ban. Programmes which "might seriously impair" the development of minors containing pornography or gratuitous violence are prohibited.
- Those which might simply be "harmful" to minors can only be transmitted when it is ensured - by selecting the time of the broadcast or by any technical measure (e.g. encryption) - that minors will not normally hear or see them.
- When harmful programmes are not encrypted, they must be preceded by an acoustic warning or by means of a clearly identifiable visual symbol throughout their duration .

Click to read the legal text of Article 27(1)

Content which is likely to impair minors

Such content must be ensured, by selecting the time of the broadcast or by any technical measure (e.g. encryption), that minors in the area of transmission will not normally hear or see such broadcasts.

Click to read the legal text of Article 27(2)(3)

Protection of minors in on-demand or Non-linear services

Programmes which "might seriously impair" the development of minors are allowed in on-demand services, but they may only be made available in such a way that minors will not normally hear or see them. This could be done by the use of PIN codes or other, more sophisticated age verification systems. There are no restrictions for programmes which might simply be "harmful".


Click to read the legal text of Article 12

How to complain about a programme ?

The European Commission does not monitor programmes on an individual basis but rather the performance of Member States in general. Therefore, the media regulator(s) of the Member State having jurisdiction is competent for following up individual complaints. If it is not clear which Member State has jurisdiction or a citizen does not speak the language of the competent Member State, she or he may also contact the media regulator of her/ his own Member State directly. Regulators are obliged to cooperate one with each other, especially in trans-border cases.

Background

The Directive obliged the Commission to submit a study of the advantages and disadvantages of other measures to facilitate parents' control of broadcasts watched by their children (filters, rating systems, etc.).

The Audiovisual Media Services Directive is complemented by the 1998 Recommendations which was the first legal instrument concerning the content of online audiovisual and information services and the 2006 Recommendations on the protection of minors and human dignity.

in: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/protection-minors-avmsd

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten